Strutta.com

Create a contest now

The Motrin Story: When Marketing Goes Horribly Wrong

In case you hadn't already heard, this week Motrin (the pain medication) released a new commercial. Days later they had already pulled it and issued a public apology.

Before we go into too much detail, let's start by watching the video in question, and then we'll try to figure out what all the fuss is about:

After the release of the commercial, the online buzz started. "Mommy bloggers" the internet over were incensed with the ad, and demanded a public apology. Twitter was, as they say atwitter, with requests for boycotts and plenty of other commentary on the matter. One letter, from the President of Babywearing International Inc (a non-profit promoting the benefits of wearing your baby) reads: 

We are deeply troubled by this campaign for the following reasons:

- It disparages babywearing mothers by portraying them as victims of a painful fashion trend;

- It falsely states that baby carriers "put a ton of strain" on the wearer's back, neck, and shoulders;

- It falsely implies that mothers who wear their babies "cry more" than those who don't;

- It portrays the research-proven benefits of babywearing as rumor or speculation subject to doubt;

- It disparagingly implies that babywearing mothers look "tired and crazy;" and

- It was timed to run during International Babywearing Week, November 12-18, 2008, when nonprofit babywearing groups all over the world are celebrating babywearing, and thousands of volunteers are working to publicize the benefits of babywearing and to encourage the practice of babywearing.

Just as we are working to create community support for this beneficial practice so that no parent will ever again be harassed or ridiculed for babywearing, McNeil is perpetuating an image of babywearing parents as silly people who make irrational choices to be in fashion. Your "mom-alogue" could hardly be more ill-timed, off-base, or damaging to babywearing parents or to parents who have yet to reap the benefits of babywearing.

That should help clear up why moms responded so passionately, but the real question is, "What was Motrin thinking?" 

Maybe it's the fact that I'm a dad who occasionally finds himself wearing just such a carrier, or maybe it's just the marketer in me, but I have to side with the baby wearers on this one. If Motrin had meant to target moms with their ad, then they had to have known it would be a dismal failure. The ad drips with sarcasm and flippancy, and offers very little in the way of empathy for moms at all.

A common response to the mommy blogger backlash has been to dismiss their response as hyper-sensitive, and I'm sure there are bloggers out there that fit that stereotype. But here's a newsflash: every parent I've met is sensitive in one way or another about their child-rearing practices, so a room full of ad agency-types should have known they should tread lightly around such a touchy subject. 

There's been plenty of discussion about it here in the office as well. James has already published his thoughts on the Adhack blog, linking to spoof vids that have already found their way to the web. Since he has already said what i intended to, I'll just reference him:

Perhaps Motrin will commission their next ad from their customers. They’ve proven able to create compelling ads. They’ve proven passionate about the products. They’ve proven they can connect and direct attention.

So, instead of guessing what they want, why not work with them and let them say what they want?

Now that sounds like it provides some pain relief.

Well said. I would go even further and say that since Motrin's brand has suffered such a huge blow, that they have no choice but to reconnect with that most influential demographic as quickly as possible, and only a sincere effort to listen will heal the wounds. 

Marketers, remember first and foremost that your customers now have a voice too, and you should never speak about them as if they're not listening. Instead, engage them at every opportunity and adapt to their feedback. Not just in a reactive way just when things go bad, but all the time. Their stories are more powerful than the ones written by your agency anyhow. 

Oh and Motrin...If you're listening, we'd be happy to provide the software platform that lets you bring these stories to light, and even lets the public or a panel of judges tell you which ones are the best ;) 

I'm curious: do you think

I'm curious: do you think the mommy (and daddy, if you like) blogosphere's reaction was appropriate and mature? That is, was the response appropriate to Motrin's misstep?

I recognize that the ad's tone might be perceived as flippant, but does it really deserve the awesome rage it inspired? That's what I find most odd--the righteous offense that so many people seemed to be taking.

After all, let's keep things in perspective. At worst, it's a slightly offensive ad for headache pills.

And, sorry, one more thing:

And, sorry, one more thing: the final paragraph of that letter is a bit laughable. Is there really a national crisis of parents being "harassed or ridiculed for babywearing"?

I just buy the yellow box

I'm not really the type to light a torch and join the lynch mob, and it would be silly for me to defend the outspoken opinions and suggestions of everyone that has jumped aboard the Motrin hate machine. But to answer your question, I recognize that some responses were anything but mature or constructive. I have yet to experience any harassment or ridicule firsthand (good thing it's fashionble, heh) so perhaps Babywearing International is stretching a little far to make their case in using the word crisis.

In truth, I'm more baffled as a marketer than I am offended as a parent. I'm floored that this one got past the multitude of layers of process between conception to creation of the ad. That no parent ever stepped in and suggested that maybe the ad should be addressed TO moms who may have back pain, and not just talk about them like they're not in the room. I mean they really, truly should have seen this coming.

And maybe Motrin and their (likely former) ad agency doesn't deserve to have such vitriol spewed at them, but I am glad they've been exposed to this learning experience. This ad and the subsequent fallout are like a metaphor for the changes in media and marketing. Stop making the mistake of talking at (or worse, about) your market, and start listening to them. It might not be too late for Motrin to take a page out of Dell's book and turn their reputation around, but it's going to take a bit more than just pulling the ad and a canned response in the form of a press release.

*On another note, I didn't link to where I found that letter, so I'll have to track it down and do as such.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <div> <span> <p> <br> <blockquote> <hr>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options